Wednesday, June 15, 2011

2007 Mazda Cx 7

images 2007 Mazda CX-7 Cruising 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX7 Grand Touring
  • 2007 Mazda CX7 Grand Touring



  • sandy_anand
    01-24 10:09 AM
    Guys, sorry I do not understand the numbers very well. Assuming the same amount of spillover numbers for 2011, what will be the status of EB2 by December-2011??


    Thanks,
    Prasad.

    If EB2-India receives around 20000 visas in 2011, the EB2-India priority dates could move to between Feb 2007 and April 2007 depending on EB3-EB2 upgrades.





    wallpaper 2007 Mazda CX7 Grand Touring 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7



  • tikka
    05-29 04:00 PM
    I have a early 2004 Priority date (EB3 India) and asked my attorney if it is wise to reapply in Eb2 as it is current in that date, and she says she believes my Eb3 PD to get current by july. Folks, what do you think ?

    I think you need to have a masters plus a 4-5 years of experience to be eligible to apply under Eb-2. Also, you would have to redo the entire process of applying in EB2.
    Dont think anyone can really guess if EB 3 will be current by July.

    Please do take a few minute and send web faxes!!

    Thank you





    2007 Mazda Cx 7. Sport Cars 2007 mazda cx 7
  • Sport Cars 2007 mazda cx 7



  • gc_chahiye
    09-14 03:23 PM
    call the attorney who is working on your case and ask if it's a good idea to go...

    You will be surprised...Most attorneys are of the opinion that this rally is important and people who are impacted by EB GC dealys should meet with lawmakers to discuss the issue.

    exactly! All Attorneys both privately and on their websites (murthy / matthew oh / greg siskind/carl shusterman etc) are all saying we NEED to make it to this rally. This is the last and best hope!





    2011 2007 Mazda CX-7 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7 Touring,
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7 Touring,



  • fcres
    08-09 10:19 AM
    Here it is

    Q #17 in http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EBFAQ1.pdf

    Q17: How will USCIS interpret the language of AC21 Sec 104(c) (for three-year H-1B extensions) during a period in which AOS applications could be filed?
    A17. USCIS interprets AC21 �104(c) as only applicable when an alien, who is the beneficiary of an approved I-140 petition, is eligible to be granted lawful permanent resident status but for application of the per country limitations. Any petitioner seeking an H-1B extension on behalf of a beneficiary pursuant to AC21 �104(c) must thus establish that at the time of filing for such extension, the alien is not eligible to be granted lawful permanent resident status on account of the per country immigrant visa limitations.

    And here is what OH says in his breaking news for July 24th after this memo

    0724/2007: AC 21 Three-Year Increment H-1B Extension Petition Availability in July and August 2007

    Under Section 104(c) of AC 21 Act, those who have an approved I-140 petition or pending EB-485 application with the approved I-140 petition are eligible for the H-1B extension in three-year increment, if they cannot file EB-485 or EB-485 is pending but cannot be adjudicated because of the visa number unavailability for him/her. The question remained whether visa number should be unavailable at the time of filing of H-1B extension or at the time of adjudication of filing. The USCIS FAQ indicates that it will be determined by the date of filing rather than date of adjudication.


    You should ask your lawyer to get an amendment. I read here yday somebody doing that.



    more...


    2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX7 Grand Touring
  • 2007 Mazda CX7 Grand Touring



  • ikass
    05-29 08:18 AM
    Hello IV members and leadership team,

    I applaud you all for your time and effort in addressing issues that concern our eligibility to work legally and mutually benefit from this country. As we strive to get CIR passed, which has been elusive for years and still struggling at various levels, I was wondering why can`t we work to get small wins. I would like to mention four known ideas that we can push forward and that I believe can be accomplished via small amendments:

    1) Temporarily remove Per country quota for Employment -Based Green Card
    2) Do not count dependents towards numerical visa count
    3) Issue EAD to candidates who have I-140 approved and renew it until Green Card number becomes available.
    4) Do not tie EAD to specific company or wait six months in a position to change jobs

    This four things can have a quick impact and give us all a temporary relief.

    We can try and build advocacy effort to get this done. Especially for the June 7th and 8th advocacy days.

    "SMALL CHANGE BIG IMPACT"

    Thanks,
    Giri





    2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2010 Mazda CX-7
  • 2010 Mazda CX-7



  • raj7480
    05-24 02:24 PM
    Can IV do a press release and circulate thru news wire? IV can write an article about legal immigration and what IV is doing for it. You can submit your release thru sites like http://www.prweb.com/

    They are free and if you pay some fee (I think $80), news will go to many popular news portals.

    This is a good time since all the news engines are seeking articles with keyword "immigration". I am sure this will open some more doors for IV.



    more...


    2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 MAZDA CX-7 CX7 AWD AUTO
  • 2007 MAZDA CX-7 CX7 AWD AUTO



  • Life2Live
    12-14 03:24 PM
    I got I-140 RFE (EB2) for education as mentioned above I have 3 yrs education and 60+ months of experience and labour says BS or Equivalent Foreign degree with 60 months of experience.

    However, the RFE says submit the evidence that it is equvalent to US 4 years degree 3 year Bachelor degree + if any other degrees. They also mentioned we do not want a simple evalutaion that has been done by private evaluators says it is equvalent to BS 4 years degrees. They want detailed explanation each degree and other diploma that is equivalent to US 10th grade, 4 years Degree by acceptable evaluator also include evalutor details.

    I am in 6th year of H1B, donno what will happen. My company said it is simple RFE. Looking for other alternatives.......





    2010 Sport Cars 2007 mazda cx 7 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7 Cruising
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7 Cruising



  • samcam
    05-23 10:53 AM
    Good job Salil..



    more...


    2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 MAZDA CX7 4 Door Interior
  • 2007 MAZDA CX7 4 Door Interior



  • tnite
    08-05 10:02 PM
    Please join us for a tri state lunch meet. We would like to start working on volunteers/ mobilizing members for the DC rally. Even if you cannot take the day off and come to DC please come by for the lunch. We could really use help with banners/posters/ and ideas to make this a success.

    WHEN: Saturday AUGUST 11th

    LOCATION- 148 E 48TH St, New York, NY 10017 (between Lexington and Third Avenues.)

    TIME: 1:30 pm

    IF YOU'RE FROM NY/NJ/CT TRISTATE AREA, PLEASE DO JOIN http://groups.yahoo.com/group/immigrationvoiceny/ (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/immigrationvoiceny/)





    hair 2007 Mazda CX-7 Touring, 2007 Mazda Cx 7. The CX-7 has clearly been
  • The CX-7 has clearly been



  • my_gc_wait
    08-10 12:16 PM
    yes, employer just needs to show that new job is similar to your old job. Its just simply a letter which an employer can(may choose not to as its not mandatory by law but advised to do so) send to USCIS.
    For EB2 classification you dont need to do anything, your emplyer need to show that job needs Masters or equivalent and it meets prevailing market salary requirements. So you can just ask them if this position meets EB2 requirements and if they will be wiling to do EB2 filing for you in addition to AC21 (or H1 transer)


    Thank you my_gc_wait.

    Regarding response #1 and your comment about AC21 portability, there isn't anything the employer has to do, correct? I believe, if the new job requirements is same or similar, there should be no problem with AC21.

    Also, what can I request from the employer other than the job advertisement itself as evidence to make sure the position suits EB2 requirements.



    more...


    2007 Mazda Cx 7. The 2007 CX-9 is Mazda#39;s
  • The 2007 CX-9 is Mazda#39;s



  • lostinbeta
    10-03 01:19 PM
    HEY.......YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!!!!!!!!!

    Well fine, if you want to play like that.....

    SPAM*(INFINITY*(INFINITY+1)*(INFINITY^INFINITY))

    :::Runs and ducks behind a building in a dark alley, gets mugged by some thugs:::

    :::evil chuckle is still heard, but is much fainter than before:::





    hot 2007 Mazda CX7 Grand Touring 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda
  • 2007 Mazda



  • vasa
    07-05 10:48 PM
    Tell the employer you'll pay for the premium but include you in the company's group insurance.even a normal delivery costs can run into 10K plus the baby has additional costs etc . Did you have group insurance from a previous company?you can continuethat on cobra..its expensive though.good luck



    more...


    house 2007 Mazda CX-7 door panel 2007 Mazda Cx 7. Essai: Mazda CX-7 GT 2007
  • Essai: Mazda CX-7 GT 2007



  • windycloud
    07-15 05:19 PM
    I have my original I94 from when I entered on F-1. And now I have the I-94 attached to my H-1B. Which one do I hand in?





    tattoo 2010 Mazda CX-7 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7 Grand Touring
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7 Grand Touring



  • zephyrr
    03-20 11:56 PM
    Question 11. When is an I-140 no longer valid for porting purposes?
    Answer: An I-140 is no longer valid for porting purposes when:
    A. an I-140 is withdrawn before the alien’s I-485 has been pending 180
    B. an I-140 is denied or revoked at any time except when it is revoked based on a withdrawal
    that was submitted after an I-485 has been pending for 180 days.

    I pulled this from the Aytes memo:http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/AC21Intrm122705.pdf

    Unless I'm not construing the above correctly, a withdrawl after 180 days has no impact. The only thing that would be a 'death-knell' is if an RFE is issued which the employer does not respond to.


    withdrawl in that case would be death-knell to your AOS case..
    there is theoretical opening for "approvable" 140 cases in yates memo, but it's more theory than practice, in the world wher USCIS is revoking approved 140s , one can't depend on such a slim glimmer of hope..



    more...


    pictures 2007 MAZDA CX-7 CX7 AWD AUTO 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7 Touring
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7 Touring



  • tinamatthew
    07-20 11:59 PM
    Let's assume Two people A and B entered into US on Jan 1st 2004 with Visa stamping Valid till June 2006.

    A is without payslips for 2 years , that is until Dec 2005(730 days).A travels out side US and re enters into US in jan 2006 , after that he'll get the payslips and stays legal , then applies for his 485 in March 2006.Then he is maintaining
    100% legal status as he is having continious payslips after his re entry.

    B doesn't have payslips for period of 185 days(aggregate) in his whole stay in US , rest of the time he maintains legal status , but he never travels outside US and applies for his 485 in March 2006.

    In this case B is under risk of illegal status for more than 180 days , as he never travelled outside US.How come this is fair law??This thought bugging me since coupe of days.Guys please share your ideas.


    Ignorance is not an excuse! If you speed and you are stopped will you tell the police man that you didnt know the speed limit on that street? I believe all immigrants should educate themselves with the law of the country and how it will affect them. I think it is a fair law that gives some people a fresh start and is very welcome for us as immigrants.





    dresses 2007 Mazda 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7



  • dixie
    09-05 05:47 PM
    Not sure what happens technically to the old CIR, but most likely both the senate and house will throw away their respective bills and start from scratch.

    I have a hypethetical situation

    1. Say in the election Dems get both house and Senate AND
    2. No compromise happens in CIR at Lame Duck Session too. Also
    no SKILL passes too AND

    3. New winners Sworn in and its congress controlled by Dems.

    Now what is the status of the CIR that was passed in the senate and
    that house bill passed? Does it expire or go annul? Or can these
    new members come a compromise on that? What could be the attittude of the congress member towards it? It would be really interesting to know the
    legal sides and political attittude of lawmakers to it.

    thanks



    more...


    makeup 2007 MAZDA CX7 4 Door Interior 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7 door panel
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7 door panel



  • somegchuh
    09-22 04:39 PM
    Is it possible to include "allow filing 485" if labor has been pending for 2+ years?

    Its not just people who have labor approved and are waiting for PD to be current. In fact there are a lot of ppl who are waiting for labor for 4+ years.

    I think its perfectly doable. If its ok to ask for ability to file 485 without PD being current, I think its ok to ask for ability to file 485 while labor is pending.

    But I guess we have gone thru this a dozen times and it doesn't appear that the plight of ppl stuck in PBEC is on IV agenda.


    vivache:

    Top on IV's goals is 'ability to file for I-485' even when visa number is not available. As you perhaps know this will enable securing an EAD. Hope this answers your question.





    girlfriend 2007 Mazda CX-7 Grand Touring 2007 Mazda Cx 7. 2007 Mazda CX-7 door handle
  • 2007 Mazda CX-7 door handle



  • shreekhand
    07-26 10:06 PM
    Dear Vikram,

    Maybe you can list the sites you have configured to search in this custom search and we can suggest adding a few more if need be.

    Nice work.





    hairstyles The 2007 CX-9 is Mazda#39;s 2007 Mazda Cx 7. The Mazda CX-7 fits neatly
  • The Mazda CX-7 fits neatly



  • panky72
    06-20 02:28 PM
    I would like to know if we can travel on AP without a I485 notice, do they ask for it at POE??

    Our attorney never told us that he did not receive my I485 notice till date!! we filed in July and he received one of the notice in Oct 2007. He is telling me now when I about to fly in a months time. He has also asked me apply for the renewal of AP & EAD, he has asked me attach the biometric notice instead of I485 notice and my husbands I485 notice.

    Can anyone who has traveled on AP without a I485 notice share their experience. Any suggestions are welcome...

    Thanks

    You can travel on H-1 without I-485 receipt according to new USCIS rule but for travel on AP you still need the receipt for 485.
    http://www.murthy.com/news/n_firule.html





    chanduv23
    09-16 02:43 PM
    I dont like selfish, coward, lazy people be my friends. Who can't stand up for thier families what can they for me.........

    Yes - true - well said.

    Libra will consider only unselfish brave folks :)

    If you are already married, check with your wife asn ask her - does she like cowards and selfish people?





    bugmenot
    03-29 02:06 PM
    does IV have any new updates on the OPT extension? as far as i know the request has been on to DHS from nov but nothings been done about it?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment